Five Criteria for Evaluating Housing Development

This is a work in progress! But I think it might be nice to have this be a standalone post that I can easily refer back to. Originally written up here.

Price Tag to the City: Will it bring in taxes that pay for itself, over the lifespan of the infrastructure and future repair? How much will it cost to extend roads, utilities, on fire and police coverage, on water and wastewater?

Housing stock: How long will it take to build? How much housing will it provide? What is the forecasted housing deficit at that point? Is it targeting a price-point that serves what San Marcos needs?

Environment: Is it on the aquifer? Is it in a flood zone? Will it create run off into the river?Are we looking at sprawl? Is it uniformly single-family homes?

Social: Is it meaningfully mixed income? Is it near existing SMCISD schools and amenities?

The San Marxist Special: Is it a mixed-income blend of single family houses, four-plexes, and eight-plexes, all mixed together? With schools, shops, restaurants, and public community space sprinkled throughout? Is it walkable?

Like I said, this is a work in progress. I’ll update it as needed.

[Update: I added the fifth question on 8/6/22.]

[Update: added “Is it walkable?” on 4/5/25]